mcherry wip (Nikon)
Structured Review

Mcherry Wip, supplied by Nikon, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 57101 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mcherry+wip/pmc02801713-103-7-16?v=Nikon
Average 99 stars, based on 57101 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Actin-binding Protein-1 Interacts with WASp-interacting Protein to Regulate Growth Factor-induced Dorsal Ruffle Formation"
Article Title: Actin-binding Protein-1 Interacts with WASp-interacting Protein to Regulate Growth Factor-induced Dorsal Ruffle Formation
Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-02-0106
Figure Legend Snippet: mAbp localizes with WIP at dorsal ruffles. (A) GFP-mAbp1 and mCherry-WIP were transiently transfected into NIH-3T3 cells. Cells were plated on FN-coated, glass-bottomed dishes and serum-starved. Cells were stimulated with PDGF and subsequently analyzed by dual, time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. Montages are representative of at least three independent experiments. Bar, 10 μm. See accompanying Video 5. (B) GFP-WIP was transiently transfected into NIH-3T3 cells. Cells were plated on FN-coated coverslips, serum-starved, and stimulated with PDGF. Cells were fixed and stained with rhodamine phalloidin and anti-cortactin antibody (top panel) or anti-mAbp1 and anti-cortactin antibodies (bottom panel). Bar, 10 μm. (C) NIH-3T3 cells were transiently transfected with GFP, GFP-C-terminal mAbp1, or GFP-C-terminal mAbp1 and mCherry WIP. Cells were plated on FN-coated coverslips, serum-starved, and stimulated with PDGF. Cells were fixed and stained with anti-cortactin antibody. A representative image of a GFP-C-terminal mAbp1 coexpressing mCherry-WIP is shown (left). Bar, 10 μm. Dorsal ruffles were quantified by counting the number of transfected cells containing at least one dorsal ruffle after stimulation with PDGF. Greater than 50 cells were counted per condition, and each condition represents the average value from three independent experiments; error bars, SEM; *p < 0.01 compared with GFP control by one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Staining